Growth & sharing checklist

This is the internal playbook for growing Warconomy without compromising it. Submit the consumer URLs below to Search Console, share the what-if and explainer pages with honest snippets, collect tester feedback, and run the weekly loop. The golden rule for every promotion: it is a scenario tool and a source-reviewed reference — never live news, never a forecast, never an asserted current price.

Top consumer URLs to index and share are listed below.
Use only the safe snippets — scenario, not forecast; no current numbers.
Watch Search Console + bounce; improve high-bounce pages, do not over-claim.

Search Console & Bing — step by step

Verify the Google Search Console domain property for warconomy.com (DNS TXT record). A domain property covers http/https and all subdomains.
Verify Bing Webmaster Tools — you can import the verified property straight from Google Search Console.
Submit the sitemap in both: warconomy.com/sitemap.xml.
Request indexing (URL Inspection → Request indexing) for the priority URLs below, top-down. Do a handful a day; don't bulk-spam.
Check back after ~3 days: are the priority URLs discovered/crawled? Some 'Crawled — currently not indexed' early on is normal.
Check back after ~7 days: are they indexed and starting to get impressions? Note the queries they show up for.

Errors that matter (fix these)

Server errors (5xx) or redirect errors on a priority URL — fix immediately.
'Page with redirect' where you expected a 200 — check the canonical.
'Blocked by robots.txt' or 'noindex' on a page you want indexed — fix the directive.
Soft 404 on a real page — usually thin content; strengthen the first screen.

Early statuses to ignore (normal)

'Crawled — currently not indexed' in the first week or two — common for new pages; keep building links and quality.
'Discovered — currently not indexed' — Google has the URL queued; patience.
Low impressions on day one — indexing and ranking take time.

Promote first: the gas tool and the top what-if pages — they have the clearest consumer intent and the strongest first screen.

Top 22 URLs to submit (Search Console)

Priority order — request indexing top-down.

https://warconomy.com/ — open
https://warconomy.com/scenario-lab#oil-to-pump — open
https://warconomy.com/scenario-lab/global-shock — open
https://warconomy.com/quiz — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if — open
https://warconomy.com/current-events — open
https://warconomy.com/what-matters — open
https://warconomy.com/start-here — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/oil-hits-100 — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/hormuz-30-days — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/red-sea-shipping — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/taiwan-chip-disruption — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/rare-earth-restrictions — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/food-fertilizer-shock — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/defense-spending-surge — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/migration-labor-shock — open
https://warconomy.com/gas-prices-and-war — open
https://warconomy.com/war-and-grocery-prices — open
https://warconomy.com/war-and-shipping-costs — open
https://warconomy.com/war-and-electronics — open
https://warconomy.com/war-and-jobs — open
https://warconomy.com/war-and-public-budgets — open

Top 11 URLs to share socially

https://warconomy.com/what-if/oil-hits-100 — open
https://warconomy.com/scenario-lab#oil-to-pump — open
https://warconomy.com/gas-prices-and-war — open
https://warconomy.com/quiz — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/hormuz-30-days — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/taiwan-chip-disruption — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if/rare-earth-restrictions — open
https://warconomy.com/war-and-grocery-prices — open
https://warconomy.com/current-events — open
https://warconomy.com/what-if — open
https://warconomy.com/what-matters — open

Safe social snippets (Reddit / Facebook / LinkedIn)

Each frames the tool as a scenario, not a forecast, and asserts no current number. Pair with a what-if or explainer URL above. Do not add a current price, casualty, outage or export figure.

What could war do to gas prices? Warconomy's gas tool shows an assumption-based low–mid–high pump range from a crude move you choose — a scenario, not a forecast.
What if Hormuz were disrupted for weeks? Explore the economic channel yourself — set the severity and duration, see the modelled pressure. A scenario, not a forecast.
Rare earths aren't lithium or cobalt. See which everyday things a rare-earth export restriction could touch — magnets, EVs, wind, defense, electronics. Assumption-based, not a forecast.
The war-economy risks people are watching now, in plain English — each linked to a scenario you can try. Current watch items, not live news.
Test your economic instincts: a free 8-question quiz where every answer is a real, source-linked number (defense spending, oil prices, sanctions caps, canal traffic). New set most days, not a forecast.

Paste-ready posts

Copy a variant, paste, done. Every one frames the tools as scenarios, not forecasts, and asserts no current number. Swap the URL for any from the list above.

Facebook

Ever wonder how a war on the other side of the world could reach your gas bill? I found a free tool that lets you set the numbers yourself and see a possible pump-price range. It's a what-if scenario, not a prediction — and it shows its sources. Worth a 2-minute play: warconomy.com/what-if/oil-hits-100
Plain-English explainer: how conflict can reach grocery prices — grain, cooking oil, fertilizer, shipping. Not scary headlines, just the pathway and a scenario you can try. warconomy.com/war-and-grocery-prices
Think you know the war economy? Try this free 8-question quiz — every answer is a real, cited number, not trivia-night guesses. New set most days: warconomy.com/quiz

[Tool] A free, source-linked 'what-if' simulator for war-economy questions (gas, shipping, chips, rare earths). You set the assumptions; it shows an assumption-based range and says plainly it's a scenario, not a forecast. No signup, no ads. Feedback welcome: warconomy.com/what-if
Made a plain-English gas-price scenario tool: pick a crude move and a pass-through assumption, get a low–mid–high pump range with the sources shown. It's a scenario, not a prediction — curious what people think: warconomy.com/scenario-lab#oil-to-pump
[Quiz] Built a free 8-question trivia quiz where every answer is a real, sourced number — SIPRI defense spending, EIA oil prices, Panama Canal traffic, sanctions caps, not made-up trivia. New questions most days, no signup, no ads: warconomy.com/quiz

How do conflicts and sanctions actually reach consumer prices? I've been using Warconomy — a source-linked reference that turns the question into an interactive, assumption-based scenario (gas, shipping, semiconductors, critical minerals, defense budgets). It's explicit that every output is a scenario, not a forecast, and every claim is cited. A useful explainer for anyone tracking supply-chain and commodity risk: warconomy.com

Text message

Found a neat free tool — set a hypothetical oil price and see what gas could do. It's a what-if, not a prediction: warconomy.com/what-if/oil-hits-100
This explains how war reaches grocery/gas prices in plain English, with sources: warconomy.com
Bet you can't get 6/8 on this quiz — every answer is a real, sourced number: warconomy.com/quiz

Ask friends to test

Could you try this for 2 minutes and tell me if it makes sense? It's a free tool that shows how wars can affect everyday prices — you set the numbers, it shows a scenario (not a prediction). Anything confusing or anything that felt like a fake claim? warconomy.com

If someone asks “is this a prediction?”

No — it is not a prediction or a forecast. Every output is a scenario built from assumptions you choose, clearly labelled, with the sources shown. It tells you how a change could travel through the economy, not what will happen. For live figures it points you to official sources (EIA, IMF PortWatch, FAO, etc.).

Feedback questions for testers

In 10 seconds on the homepage, did you know what the site is for?
Could you find the gas-price tool without help?
Did any number look like a claim about today rather than a what-if you set?
Did anything read like a prediction or live news? (It should not.)
On mobile, did anything overflow or feel cramped?
What would you have shared with a friend — and what stopped you?

Weekly review loop

Run npm run watchlist:check, operator:check and verify:prod.
Check Search Console: impressions/clicks for the consumer URLs above and any new queries.
Note pages with high bounce or low dwell — improve clarity above the fold, do not add claims.
Re-review any overdue watch items (watchlist board); advance the review clock.
Refresh one social snippet if a what-if page has changed; keep wording scenario-not-forecast.

Weekly content-review loop

Re-check each current watch item's source on cadence; update WATCH_REVIEWS and advance the review clock (watchlist board).
Skim the briefings for any that read stale; tighten the quick answer, keep them source-reviewed.
Confirm every scenario output still says 'scenario, not a forecast' and asserts no current number.
Spot-check the what-if and landing pages on mobile for first-screen clarity.
Run npm run watchlist:check and npm run validate:release before any content push.

Pages to monitor & improve

Monitor in Search Console: homepage, /what-if, the six /war-and-* explainers, /current-events, /scenario-lab.
If bounce is high: tighten the first screen — lead with the question and the tool button; move methodology lower; check mobile overflow.

⚠️ What not to claim in promotions

No current prices, casualty, outage, export, GDP, inflation or shipping numbers.
No “live”, “breaking” or news-feed framing — it is a source-reviewed watchlist, not live news.
No forecasts or predictions — every output is an assumption-based scenario.
No investment advice. No implying Warconomy attributes a price move to a specific event.