Model card · v1.0

Policy sequencing (institutional-process)

Looks at how an institution like the EU Council actually passes measures — who has to agree, how long similar steps took before — to judge whether a proposed measure lands by a given date.

What a model card is forThis page exists so any Warconomy forecast produced by this model can be audited: what it assumes, where it breaks, how its uncertainty is built, and what simple baseline it must beat to be worth running. Forecasts are decision-support, not advice.

At a glance

Model IDpolicy-sequencing-v1
Version1.0
Method familyexpert defined scenario
Intended useEstimate the likelihood that a named institution takes a defined, publicly-observable policy action within a stated window, based on its own announced process, precedent timing, and required approval thresholds.
Update cadenceper event
Analyst judgmentYes — a human sets or adjusts key parameters (see below)
Forecasts using it1

Assumptions

  • The institution follows its stated procedural sequence (proposal, negotiation, adoption) rather than acting outside it.
  • Historical timing between an equivalent proposal and adoption is informative about the current one.
  • Publicly-stated intent by decision-makers is meaningful evidence, though not binding.

Known weaknesses and failure conditions

  • Unanimity- or consensus-based bodies can be blocked indefinitely by a single holdout, which precedent timing systematically under-weights.
  • Announced target dates routinely slip without any public correction.
  • Relies on reported negotiating positions that are often second-hand and contested.

How uncertainty is built

Expressed as a coarse probability band only (very-unlikely through very-likely), never a decimal percentage, because the reference class of comparable past decisions is small.

Validation and baseline comparison

Scored on resolution against the institution's own published legal act (its official journal or press release), and compared against a base-rate baseline derived from how often comparable proposals were adopted within a similar window.

Model change history

VersionChange
1.0Initial production release of this model card, issued with Warconomy's first forecast portfolio.

Model versions are immutable. A material methodology change produces a new version, and forecasts issued under the old version keep pointing at the version that produced them.

Forecasts produced by this model

Related

All forecasting methods · Responsible forecasting policy · Active forecasts · Track record