Indicator citation card

Suez Canal transit change

-42 % vs. peak · vs. peak, UNCTAD rapid assessment (Feb 2024)

stale snapshot — review recommended · reviewed as of June 5, 2026
Value-42 % vs. peak
Periodvs. peak, UNCTAD rapid assessment (Feb 2024)
As ofFebruary 22, 2024
Last reviewedJune 5, 2026
Confidencemedium
Data modelive · source-linked
Citation readinesshigh readiness

Note

UNCTAD estimated that Suez Canal transits had decreased by 42% compared with their peak during the acute phase of the Red Sea disruption (rapid assessment, 22 February 2024). A dated source-reported snapshot, not real-time; a manual review against fresher data is recommended. Not a causal attribution to any single event.

Version history

This observation is byte-present in 151 frozen dataset versions, from v1.37.0 to v1.187.0. Appearances are derived from committed frozen payloads only — not fabricated for versions that predate the full-payload store.

Full record history: records/observation--obs-redsea-suez/data.json · per-version field diffs: /changes/compare.

Relationships & machine-readable

Indicator JSON (with a relationship graph): indicators/obs-redsea-suez/data.json · source page: UNCTAD — Navigating troubled waters (Red Sea / Suez rapid assessment) · per-record provenance.

How to cite

Suez Canal transit change: -42 % vs. peak (vs. peak, UNCTAD rapid assessment (Feb 2024)), UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD), via Warconomy. https://warconomy.com/indicators/obs-redsea-suez. Source-linked, manually maintained; not real-time.

Machine-readable: data.json · source registry · full page.